<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Dazed &#38; Confused &#187; realtime</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.f12.no/wp/tag/realtime/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.f12.no/wp</link>
	<description>Agile and Programming</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 11:05:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Report on zero-defect code</title>
		<link>http://blog.f12.no/wp/2008/10/19/report-on-zero-defect-code/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.f12.no/wp/2008/10/19/report-on-zero-defect-code/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 12:07:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anders</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[realtime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[verificatiion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.f12.no/wp/?p=778</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The US National Security Agency has released a case study showing how to develop zero-defect code in a cost-effective manner. Diomidis D. Spinellis has taken a closer look at the claims and the code released for this project. At first when I read through the article I agree with most his points, but it gets [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The US National Security Agency has released a case study showing how to develop zero-defect code in a cost-effective manner. <a href="http://www.spinellis.gr/cgi-bin/comment.pl?date=20081018#comments">Diomidis D. Spinellis has taken a closer look at the claims and the code released</a> for this project. At first when I read through the article I agree with most his points, but it gets quite interesting when I read the comments.</p>
<p>The things we consider important when living in our business-entrepriecey-systems-world might not be feasible when you&#8217;re doing realtime-secure-flightsystems etc. If you are working under the paradigm of formal verification, <a href="http://www.spinellis.gr/cgi-bin/comment.pl?date=20081018#1224397000">loops might be a bad thing</a>.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know much about this stuff, and I am quite content not needing to think about it. That said I really try to strive for zero-defect, maintainable code, it just doesn&#8217;t seem worth it doing formal verification on most systems I work on. I should look into it though to learn a little about it without picking it up. I think working in this fashion will probably block all attempts to be agile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.f12.no/wp/2008/10/19/report-on-zero-defect-code/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

